Концепт — разлика између измена

Садржај обрисан Садржај додат
м +
Autobot (разговор | доприноси)
м Разне исправке; козметичке измене
Ред 3:
== Литература ==
{{refbegin|2}}
* Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1999). what some concepts might not be. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, Concepts (pp.  225–261). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* Carey, S. (1999). knowledge acquisition: enrichment or conceptual change? In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp.  459–489). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* Fodor, J. A., Garrett, M. F., Walker, E. C., & Parkes, C. H. (1999). against definitions. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp.  491–513). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* Fodor, J., & LePore, E. (1996). the pet fish and the red Herring: why concept still can't be prototypes. cognition, 253–270.
* Hume, D. (1739). book one part one: of the understanding of ideas, their origin, composition, connexion, abstraction etc. In D. Hume, a treatise of human nature. England.
* Murphy, G. (2004). Chapter 2. In G. Murphy, a big book of concepts (pp.  11 – 41). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* Murphy, G., & Medin, D. (1999). the role of theories in conceptual coherence. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp.  425–459). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* Prinz, J. J. (2002). Desiderata on a Theory of Concepts. In J. J. Prinz, Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis (pp.  1–23). Massechusettes: MIT press.
* Putnam, H. (1999). is semantics possible? In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp.  177–189). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* Quine, W. (1999). two dogmas of empiricism. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp.  153–171). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* Rey, G. (1999). Concepts and Stereotypes. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core Readings (pp.  279–301). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
* Rosch, E. (1977). Classification of real-world objects: Origins and representations in cognition. In P. Johnson-Laird, & P. Wason, Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science (pp.  212–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
* Rosch, E. (1999). Principles of Categorization. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core Readings (pp.  189–206). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
* Schneider, S. (2011). Concepts: A Pragmatist Theory. In S.Schneider, The Language of Thought: a New Direction. Mass.: MIT Press.
* Wittgenstein, L. (1999). philosophical investigations: sections 65–78. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp.  171–175). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* ''The History of Calculus and its Conceptual Development'', [[Carl Benjamin Boyer]], [[Dover Publications]],. {{page|year=|id=ISBN 0-486-60509-4|pages=}}
* ''The Writings of William James'', [[University of Chicago Press]],. {{page|year=|id=ISBN 0-226-39188-4|pages=}}
* ''[[Logic]]'', [[Immanuel Kant]], Dover Publications,. {{page|year=|id=ISBN 0-486-25650-2|pages=}}
* ''[[A System of Logic]]'', John Stuart Mill, University Press of the Pacific,. {{page|year=|id=ISBN 1-4102-0252-6|pages=}}
* ''Parerga and Paralipomena'', Arthur Schopenhauer, Volume I, [[Oxford University Press]],. {{page|year=|id=ISBN 0-19-824508-4|pages=}}
* ''Kant's Metaphysic of Experience'', H. J. Paton, London: Allen & Unwin, 1936
* ''Conceptual Integration Networks.'' Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner, 1998. ''Cognitive Science.'' Volume 22, number 2 (April–June 1998), pages 133–187.
* ''The Portable Nietzsche'', Penguin Books,. {{page|year=1982, |id=ISBN 0-14-015062-5|pages=}}
* Stephen Laurence and Eric Margolis [http://www.philosophy.dept.shef.ac.uk/papers/CCS.pdf "Concepts and Cognitive Science"]. In ''Concepts: Core Readings'', [[MIT Press]] pp.  3–81, 1999.
* Birger Hjørland. (2009). Concept Theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1519–1536
* Georgij Yu. Somov (2010). Concepts and Senses in Visual Art: Through the example of analysis of some works by [[Pieter Bruegel the Elder|Bruegel the Elder]]. ''[[Semiotica]]'' 182 (1/4), 475–506.