Обавеза — разлика између измена
Садржај обрисан Садржај додат
wikidata |
. |
||
Ред 1:
'''Обавеза''' или '''облигација''' је захтевање одређене врсте [[делање|делања]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/promise|title=promise|author=|date=|accessdate=26 April 2018|via=The Free Dictionary}}</ref> Постоје [[морал]]не, [[закон]]ске, друштвене, религијске и друге обавезе. Обавезе се одређују сукладно [[Људска права|правима]]. Такође може значити способност за добро, сличну вредности која треба да се оствари у блиској будућности.<ref>Pierce, DorisJOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SCIENCE, V. 19 (4), 09/2012, p. 298-311</ref>
== Правна облигација ==
Ред 85:
д) [[Колективни уговори]] – закључују их надлежне синдикалне организације са организацијом послодаваца и њима се уређују права и обавезе радника у радном односу. Такав уговор производи правна дејства за сва лица која припадају одређеној групи, без обзира да ли су сви дали своју сагласност јер одлука већине обавезује и мањину групе.
== Референце ==
{{reflist}}
== Литература ==
{{refbegin|30em}}
* Јаков Радишић: ''Облигационо право'', Београд 2004
* Слободан Перовић: ''Облигационо право'', Београд 1982
* [[Plato]], ''[[The Republic (Plato)|The Republic]]'' (ca 370 BC) Book I, 33IB
* [[Cicero]], ''[[De Officiis]]'' (ca 20 BC) I, C. IO, III, cc. 24-25
* ''[[Decretals of Gregory IX]]'' lib. II, tit. 26, C. 27, [[canon law]] did not enforce all promises
* Reinach, ''The Apriorischen Grundlagen des Bürgerlichen Rechtes'' (1922) §§ 2-4, that all rational societies need to have some way of making promises binding
* Hooker, Brad. "Moral Rules and Principles." Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Donald M. Borchert. 2nd ed. Vol. 6. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2006. 382-385.
* {{cite journal |first1=Melissa |last1=Wheatcroft |date=Winter 1999 |title=Duty to Retreat for Cohabitants – In New Jersey a Battered Spouse's Home Is Not Her Castle |journal=Rutgers Law Journal |volume=30 |pages=539}}
* {{cite journal |first1=Joseph H. |last1=Beale |date=June 1903 |title=Retreat from a Murderous Assault |journal=Harvard Law Review |volume=16 |issue=8 |pages=567–82 |jstor=1323119 |doi=10.2307/1323119}}
* {{cite journal |doi=10.1017/S0008197300086128 |title=Self-Defence and the Right to Life |year=2009 |last1=Ashworth |first1=A. J. |journal=The Cambridge Law Journal |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=282}}
* {{cite journal |first1=Garrett |last1=Epps |date=Winter 1992 |title=Any Which Way but Loose: Interpretive Strategies and Attitudes Toward Violence in the Evolution of the Anglo-American 'Retreat Rule' |journal=Law and Contemporary Problems |volume=55 |issue=1 |pages=303–31 |url=http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol55/iss1/16 |jstor=1191769 |doi=10.2307/1191769}}
* {{cite journal |first1=Richard Maxwell |last1=Brown |year=1979 |title=Southern Violence — Regional Problem or National Nemesis?: Legal Attitudes Toward Southern Homicide in Historical Perspective |journal=Vanderbilt Law Review |volume=32 |issue=1 |pages=225–50}}
* Brown, Richard Maxwell (1991). ''No Duty to Retreat: Violence and Values in American History and Society''. (New York: Oxford University Press).
* {{cite journal |last1=Ross |first1=Luevonda P. |date=Fall 2007 |title=Transmogrification of Self-Defense by National Rifle Association-Inspired Statutes: From the Doctrine of Retreat to the Right to Stand Your Ground |journal=Southern University Law Review |volume=35 |pages=1}}
* Suk, Jeannie. (2009). ''At Home in the Law: How the Domestic Violence Revolution is Transforming Privacy''. (New Haven: Yale University Press).
* [[P Birks]], ‘The Content of Fiduciary Obligation’ (2000) 34 Israel Law Journal 3; (2002) 16 Trust Law International 34
* M Conaglen, ‘The Nature and Function of Fiduciary Loyalty’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 452 - 480.
* [[JH Langbein]] ‘Questioning the Trust Law Duty of Loyalty’ (2005) 114 Yale Law Journal 929 - 990.
* A Hicks, ‘The Trustee Act 2000 and the Modern Meaning of 'Investment''’ (2001) 15 (4) Trust Law International 203
* DA De Mott, 'Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary Obligation' (1988) 5 Duke Law Journal 879.
* PD Finn, 'The Fiduciary Principle' in TG Youdan (ed) 'Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts' (1989) Carswell.
* T Frankel, 'Fiduciary Law' (1983) California Law Review 795.
* DR Paling ‘Trustees Duties of Skill and Care’ (1973) 37 Conveyancer 48 - 59
* [[EJ Weinrib]], ‘The Fiduciary Obligation’ (1975) 25(1) University of Toronto Law Journal 1 - 22
* LI Rotman "Fiduciary Law's 'Holy Grail': Reconciling Theory and Practice in Fiduciary Jurisprudence" (2011) 91 Boston University Law Review 921-971.
* LI Rotman "Fiduciary Doctrine: A Concept in Need of Understanding" (1996) 34 Alberta Law Review 821-852.
* Bryan, M.W and V.J Vann ''Equity & Trusts in Australia'' (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed, 2013)ch 10.
* Chodos, Rafael, 'The Law of Fiduciary Duties' (2001) Blackthorne Legal Press
* Finn, P.D., 'Fiduciary Obligations' (1977) The Law Book Co.
* Frankel, Tamar, 'Fiduciary Law' (2008) Fathom Publishing Company
* Frankel, Tamar, 'Legal Duries of Fiduciaries' (2012) Fathom Publishing Company
* Frankel, Tamar, 'Fiduciary Law' (2010) Oxford University Press {{ISBN|978-0195391565}}.
* Rotman, Leonard I., 'Fiduciary Law' (2005) Thomson/Carswell {{ISBN|0-459-24249-0}}.
{{refend}}
== Спољашње везе ==
{{светоназор|аспекти}}▼
{{Commons category|Duty}}
* {{In Our Time|Duty|p0054935|Duty}}
* -{[http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/HypotheticalImperatives.asp Duty and Moral Worth]}-
▲{{светоназор|аспекти}}
{{нормативна контрола}}
| |||