|
== Утицај и интелектуално наслеђе ==
{{rut}}
David Ricardo's ideas had a tremendous influence on later developments in economics. US economists rank Ricardo as the second most influential economic thinker, behind Adam Smith, prior to the twentieth century.<ref>Davis, William L., Bob Figgins, David Hedengren, and Daniel B. Klein. "Economics Professors' Favorite Economic Thinkers, Journals and Blogs (along with Party and Policy Views)," ''Econ Journal Watch'' 8(2): 126–146, May 2011 [http://econjwatch.org/articles/economics-professors-favorite-economic-thinkers-journals-and-blogs-along-with-party-and-policy-views].</ref> ▼
▲DavidИдеје Ricardo'sДејвида ideasРикарда hadимале aсу tremendousогроман influenceутицај onна laterкаснији developmentsразвој in economicsекономије. USАмерички economistsекономисти rankрангирају RicardoРикарда asкао theдругог secondнајутицајнијег mostекономског influentialмислиоца, economicиза thinker,[[Адам behindСмит|Адама Adam SmithСмита]], prior to theпре twentiethдвадесетог centuryвека.<ref>Davis, William L., Bob Figgins, David Hedengren, and Daniel B. Klein. "Economics Professors' Favorite Economic Thinkers, Journals and Blogs (along with Party and Policy Views)," ''Econ Journal Watch'' 8(2): 126–146, May 2011 [http://econjwatch.org/articles/economics-professors-favorite-economic-thinkers-journals-and-blogs-along-with-party-and-policy-views].</ref>
===Ricardian socialists===
{{main|Ricardian socialism}}
=== Рикардијански социјалисти ===
Ricardo's writings fascinated a number of early socialists in the 1820s, who thought his value theory had radical implications. They argued that, in view of labour theory of value, labour produces the entire product, and the profits capitalists get are a result of exploitations of workers.<ref>Landreth Colander 1989 ''History of Economic Thought'' Second Edition, p.137.</ref> These include [[Thomas Hodgskin]], [[William Thompson (philosopher)|William Thompson]], [[John Francis Bray]], and [[Percy Ravenstone]].
{{main|Рикардијански социјализам}}
Рикардови списи су фасцинирали бројне ране социјалисте током 1820-их, који су сматрали да његова теорија вредности има радикалне импликације. Они су тврдили да, с обзиром на радну теорију вредности, рад производи целокупан производ, а профит који капиталисти добијају резултат је експлоатације радника..<ref>Landreth Colander 1989 ''History of Economic Thought'' Second Edition, p.137.</ref> Међу њима су [[Thomas Hodgskin|Томас Хоџскин]], [[William Thompson (philosopher)|Вилијам Томпсон]], [[John Francis Bray|Џон Франсис Бреј]] и [[Percy Ravenstone|Перси Рејвенстон]].
====Neo-Ricardian trade theory====
Inspired by [[Piero Sraffa]], a new strand of trade theory emerged and was named neo-Ricardian trade theory. The main contributors include [[Ian Steedman]] and [[Stanley Metcalfe (trade theorist)|Stanley Metcalfe]]. They have criticised neoclassical international trade theory, namely the [[Heckscher–Ohlin model]] on the basis that the notion of capital as primary factor has no method of measuring it before the determination of profit rate (thus trapped in a logical vicious circle).<ref>{{cite book |editor-last=Steedman |editor-first=Ian |year=1979 |title=Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory |location=London |publisher=MacMillan |isbn=0-333-25834-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Steedman |first=Ian |title=Trade Amongst Growing Economies |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, UK |year=1979 |pages= |isbn=0-521-22671-6 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/tradeamongstgrow0000stee }}</ref> This was a second round of the [[Cambridge capital controversy]], this time in the field of international trade.<ref>{{cite book |first=Chris |last=Edwards |year=1985 |title=The Fragmented World: Competing Perspectives on Trade, Money, and Crisis |location=London and New York |publisher=Methuen & Co. |chapter=§ 3.2 The 'Sraffian' Approach to Trade Theory |pages=48–51 |isbn=0-416-73390-5}}</ref> Depoortère and Ravix judge that neo-Ricardian contribution failed without giving effective impact on neoclassical trade theory, because it could not offer "a genuine alternative approach from a classical point of view."<ref>Christophe Depoortère, Joël Thomas Ravix; "The classical theory of international trade after Sraffa". ''Cahiers d'économie Politique / Papers in Political Economy'' (69): 203–234, February 2015.</ref> ▼
==== Неорикардијанска теорија трговине ====
====Evolutionary growth theory====
Several distinctive groups have sprung out of the neo-Ricardian school. One is the evolutionary growth theory, developed notably by [[Luigi Pasinetti]], J.S. Metcalfe, Pier Paolo Saviotti, and Koen Frenken and others.<ref>Pasinetti, Luisi 1981 Structural change and economic growth, Cambridge University Press. J.S. Metcalfe and P.P. Saviotti (eds.), 1991, ''Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change'', Harwood, 275 pages. J.S. Metcalfe 1998, ''Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction'', Routledge, London. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F.G., Verburg, T., Boschma, R.A. (2004). ''Variety and Regional Economic Growth in the Netherlands – Final Report'' (The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs), 58 p.</ref><ref>{{citation |doi=10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5 |title=Export variety and the economic performance of countries |year=2008 |last1=Saviotti |first1=Pier Paolo |last2=Frenken |first2=Koen |journal=[[Journal of Evolutionary Economics]] |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=201–218|hdl=1874/387420 |s2cid=154150526 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> ▼
▲Inspired byИнспирисан [[Piero Sraffa |Пјером Срафом]], aпојавила newсе strandнова ofструја tradeтеорије theoryтрговине emergedи andназвана wasнеорикардијанска named neo-Ricardian tradeтеорија theoryтрговине. TheГлавни mainдоприносиоци contributors includeсу [[ IanИјан SteedmanСтидман]] andи [[Stanley Metcalfe (trade theorist)| StanleyСтенли MetcalfeМетлалф]]. TheyОни haveсу criticisedкритиковали neoclassicalнеокласичну internationalтеорију tradeмеђународне theoryтрговине, namely theодносно [[Heckscher–Ohlin model |Хекшер–Олинов модел]] onна theбази basisтога thatда theпојам notionкапитала ofкао capitalпримарног asфактора primaryнема factorметод hasза noњегово methodмерење ofпре measuringодређивања itпрофитне beforeстопе the(стога determinationје ofразматрање profit rate (thus trapped inзаробљено aу logicalлогичком viciousзачараном circleкругу).<ref>{{cite book |editor-last=Steedman |editor-first=Ian |year=1979 |title=Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory |location=London |publisher=MacMillan |isbn=0-333-25834-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Steedman |first=Ian |title=Trade Amongst Growing Economies |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, UK |year=1979 |pages= |isbn=0-521-22671-6 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/tradeamongstgrow0000stee }}</ref> ThisОво wasје aбио secondдруги round of theдео [[Cambridge capital controversy |Кембриџшке контроверзе о капиталу]], thisовога timeпута inу theпољу fieldмеђународне of international tradeтрговине.<ref>{{cite book |first=Chris |last=Edwards |year=1985 |title=The Fragmented World: Competing Perspectives on Trade, Money, and Crisis |location=London and New York |publisher=Methuen & Co. |chapter=§ 3.2 The 'Sraffian' Approach to Trade Theory |pages=48–51 |isbn=0-416-73390-5}}</ref> DepoortèreДепортер andи RavixРавикс judgeсматрају thatда neo-Ricardianнеорикардијански contributionдопринос failedостао withoutбез givingефективног effectiveутицаја impactна onнеокласичну neoclassicalтеорију trade theoryтрговине, because it could notјер offerније "aмогао genuineда alternativeпонуди approach„истински fromалтернативни aприступ classicalса pointкласичне ofтачке viewгледишта. "“<ref>Christophe Depoortère, Joël Thomas Ravix; "The classical theory of international trade after Sraffa". ''Cahiers d'économie Politique / Papers in Political Economy'' (69): 203–234, February 2015.</ref>
Pasinetti<ref>{{citation |author=Pasinetti, Luigi L. |title=Structural change and economic growth: a theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, UK |year=1981 |isbn=0-521-27410-9 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |author=Pasinetti, Luigi L. |title=Structural economic dynamics: a theory of the economic consequences of human learning |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |year=1993 |isbn=0-521-43282-0 }}</ref> argued that the demand for any commodity came to stagnate and frequently decline, demand saturation occurs. Introduction of new commodities (goods and services) is necessary to avoid economic stagnation. ▼
==== Теорија еволуционог раста ====
▲SeveralИз distinctiveнеорикардијанске groupsшколе haveје sprungизникло outнеколико ofпрепознатљивих the neo-Ricardian schoolгрупа. OneЈедна isје theтеорија evolutionaryеволуционог growth theoryраста, developedкоју notablyсу byразвили [[Luigi Pasinetti |Луиђи Пасинети]], JЈ. SС. MetcalfeМеткалф, PierПјер PaoloПаоло SaviottiСавиоти, andи KoenКоен FrenkenФренкен andи othersдруги.<ref>Pasinetti, Luisi 1981 Structural change and economic growth, Cambridge University Press. J.S. Metcalfe and P.P. Saviotti (eds.), 1991, ''Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change'', Harwood, 275 pages. J.S. Metcalfe 1998, ''Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction'', Routledge, London. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F.G., Verburg, T., Boschma, R.A. (2004). ''Variety and Regional Economic Growth in the Netherlands – Final Report'' (The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs), 58 p.</ref><ref>{{citation |doi=10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5 |title=Export variety and the economic performance of countries |year=2008 |last1=Saviotti |first1=Pier Paolo |last2=Frenken |first2=Koen |journal=[[Journal of Evolutionary Economics]] |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=201–218|hdl=1874/387420 |s2cid=154150526 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>
▲PasinettiПасинети<ref>{{citation |author=Pasinetti, Luigi L. |title=Structural change and economic growth: a theoretical essay on the dynamics of the wealth of nations |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, UK |year=1981 |isbn=0-521-27410-9 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |author=Pasinetti, Luigi L. |title=Structural economic dynamics: a theory of the economic consequences of human learning |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |year=1993 |isbn=0-521-43282-0 }}</ref> arguedје thatтврдио theда demandпотражња forза anyбило commodityкојом cameробом toдолази stagnateдо andступња стагнације frequentlyи declineчесто опадања, demandте saturationда occurs.је Introductionувођење ofнових new commoditiesроба ( goodsроба andи servicesуслуга) isнеопходно necessaryје toда avoidби economicсе избегла економска stagnationстагнација.
== Референце ==
|
