Датотека:Edmund Muskie (D-ME) (cropped).jpg
![Датотека:Edmund Muskie (D-ME) (cropped).jpg](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Edmund_Muskie_%28D-ME%29_%28cropped%29.jpg/449px-Edmund_Muskie_%28D-ME%29_%28cropped%29.jpg)
Originalna datoteka (1.297 × 1.730 piksela, veličina datoteke: 962 kB, MIME tip: image/jpeg)
![]() | Ovo je datoteka sa Vikimedijine ostave. Informacije sa njene stranice sa opisom prikazane su ispod. Vikimedijina ostava je skladište slobodno licenciralnih multimedijalnih datoteka. I Vi možete da pomognete. |
![]() |
![]() Ова датотека је предложена за брисање на датум 11 jun 2024. Да бисте разговарали, посетите страницу предлога.
Не уклањајте ову налепницу све док се расправа не затвори. Разлог: Continuing from Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Bettmann_Archive_photos. All photos nominated here are post-1963 US images, ranging from 1964 to the 1980s. These photos claim to be in the public domain due to 'lack of notice' using the {{PD-US-no notice}} template. However, there is little to no proof of that.
My main concern is not that we are violating the copyright of a stock site, but that there is not enough proof these images actually meet the PD no-notice tag criteria. I am not denying they were published, rather the 'no notice' claims are hard to prove and assumptions are being made here. The first problem is that we cannot see the entire print, sheet or strip to verify the lack of notice claims. The copyright notice would not be on the photo like a watermark; it would be elsewhere. Getty only shows the high-resolution scan of the front. An example of an image that shows no notice, this UPI photo: File:Senator Ross Bass "On the Job!" (1965 UPI press photo).jpg, can be seen on the rear. Most of these photographs from the Bettmann Archive could very well be public domain, but without seeing the whole photo or its backside where a notice might be, its copyright status is uncertain. Assuming it's public domain without further verification is risky. The second problem is that almost all photos are credited to an 'unknown author.' How are we supposed to know who took the photo? Otto Bettmann was the collector of these photos, not the creator or copyright holder, and neither is Getty. Many photos come from various sources and creators, and I did see some that are credited to UPI, a press agency, so perhaps other copies exist elsewhere. This is also problematic for photos from 1978 and later, as we cannot really search for registrations. For pre-1964 photos, we can search for renewals, so it is not the same concern as with the 1964-1989 photos. Essentially, any and all photos could be Public Domain, but there is a serious lack of evidence to back up those claims. I am making this mass DR as I have doubts on the freedom of these files, but also for a consensus. What do we do with all these photos? There are millions more in the archive that could be useful to the Commons. Would love to hear others opinions on this. | ||
Кликните овде за приказ додатних упута
Ако је шаблон за номинацију додат јер сте кликнули на линк за номинацију за брисање у левом менију, побрините се да све потребне странице буду направљене. Ако се не направе након неколико минута, или ако сте шаблон за номинацију додали ручно, требало би да испратите следеће кораке:
{{subst:delete2|image=Files found with Bettmann|reason=Continuing from Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Bettmann_Archive_photos. All photos nominated here are post-1963 US images, ranging from 1964 to the 1980s. These photos claim to be in the public domain due to 'lack of notice' using the {{PD-US-no notice}} template. However, there is little to no proof of that.
My main concern is not that we are violating the copyright of a stock site, but that there is not enough proof these images actually meet the PD no-notice tag criteria. I am not denying they were published, rather the 'no notice' claims are hard to prove and assumptions are being made here. The first problem is that we cannot see the entire print, sheet or strip to verify the lack of notice claims. The copyright notice would not be on the photo like a watermark; it would be elsewhere. Getty only shows the high-resolution scan of the front. An example of an image that shows no notice, this UPI photo: File:Senator Ross Bass "On the Job!" (1965 UPI press photo).jpg, can be seen on the rear. Most of these photographs from the Bettmann Archive could very well be public domain, but without seeing the whole photo or its backside where a notice might be, its copyright status is uncertain. Assuming it's public domain without further verification is risky. The second problem is that almost all photos are credited to an 'unknown author.' How are we supposed to know who took the photo? Otto Bettmann was the collector of these photos, not the creator or copyright holder, and neither is Getty. Many photos come from various sources and creators, and I did see some that are credited to UPI, a press agency, so perhaps other copies exist elsewhere. This is also problematic for photos from 1978 and later, as we cannot really search for registrations. For pre-1964 photos, we can search for renewals, so it is not the same concern as with the 1964-1989 photos. Essentially, any and all photos could be Public Domain, but there is a serious lack of evidence to back up those claims. I am making this mass DR as I have doubts on the freedom of these files, but also for a consensus. What do we do with all these photos? There are millions more in the archive that could be useful to the Commons. Would love to hear others opinions on this.}} ~~~~
За масовна брисања: Ако желите да номинујете неколико повезаних слика, побрините се да поднесете масовни захтев ручно додавајући {{delete|reason=разлог|subpage=подстраница|year=2024|month=July|day=18}} за сваку страницу датотеке и потом пратећи већ дате кораке. (помоћ око масовних захтева) Напомена: Шаблон за номинацију је за захтеве за које је вероватно потребна дискусија како би били испуњени. За брза брисања, можете да користите {{speedy|разлог}}.
|
Opis izmene
OpisEdmund Muskie (D-ME) (cropped).jpg | Washington: Back from a four-nation overseas tour, Senator Edmund Muskie (D-ME), tells a news conference he no longer favored the unilateral withdrawal of U.S. troops from Europe. "I am having second thoughts now," Muskie said. "My view has been changed somewhat because of this trip." | ||||||
Datum | |||||||
Izvor | Bettmann Archive[1] | ||||||
Autor | N/A; Dedicated to the Bettmann Archives | ||||||
Dozvola (Ponovno korišćenje ove datoteke) |
The Bettmann archives does not hold the copyright to their photos; and the images do not have copyright notices.[2]
|
||||||
Ostale verzije |
|
- ↑ https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/back-from-a-four-nation-overseas-tour-senator-edmund-muskie-news-photo/515291574
- ↑ https://www3.wcl.american.edu/cni/0001/24223.html#:~:text=The%20Archives%2C%20encompassing%20more%20than,and%20others%20still%20under%20copyright.
Natpisi
Stavke prikazane u ovoj datoteci
prikazuje
18. januar 1971
image/jpeg
veličina podatka Serbian (transliteracija)
985.084 bajt
visina Serbian (transliteracija)
1.730 piksel
širina Serbian (transliteracija)
1.297 piksel
kontrolna suma Serbian (transliteracija)
3e467e6123f2267d109642cc470f457e3f5de690
Istorija datoteke
Kliknite na datum/vreme da biste videli tadašnju verziju datoteke.
Datum/vreme | Minijatura | Dimenzije | Korisnik | Komentar | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
trenutna | 15:49, 23. februar 2023. | ![]() | 1.297 × 1.730 (962 kB) | AlaskaGALT | File:Edmund Muskie (D-ME).jpg cropped 55 % horizontally, 13 % vertically using CropTool with lossless mode. |
Upotreba datoteke
Sledeća stranica koristi ovu datoteku:
Globalna upotreba datoteke
Drugi vikiji koji koriste ovu datoteku:
- Upotreba na ckb.wikipedia.org
- Upotreba na en.wikipedia.org
- Upotreba na ja.wikipedia.org
- Upotreba na ka.wikipedia.org
- Upotreba na simple.wikipedia.org
- Upotreba na tr.wikipedia.org
Metapodaci
Ova datoteka sadrži dodatne podatke, koji verovatno dolaze od digitalnog fotoaparata ili skenera korišćenog za digitalizaciju.
Ako je prvobitno stanje datoteke promenjeno, moguće je da neki detalji ne opisuju izmenjenu datoteku u potpunosti.
Komentar na datoteku JPEG | CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100 |
---|