Metaanaliza — разлика између измена

Садржај обрисан Садржај додат
м .
→‎Literatura: ispravke formata datuma
Ред 13:
* Sutton, A.J., Jones, D.R., Abrams, K.R., Sheldon, T.A., & Song, F. (2000). ''Methods for Meta-analysis in Medical Research''. London: John Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-49066-1
* Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org
* {{Cite journal |doi=10.1016/0140-6736(91)91975-Z |date=2. November11. 1991 |last=Thompson |first=Simon G |last2=Pocock |first2=Stuart J |title=Can meta-analysis be trusted? |journal=The Lancet |volume=338 |pages=1127–1130 |url=http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2047231315-1318.pdf |accessdate=17. 6. 2011. |pmid=1682553 |issue=8775 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111122083418/http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2047231315-1318.pdf |archive-date=22. 11. 2011 |url-status=dead |df= }}. Explores two contrasting views: does meta-analysis provide "objective, quantitative methods for combining evidence from separate but similar studies" or merely "statistical tricks which make unjustified assumptions in producing oversimplified generalisations out of a complex of disparate studies"?
* Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W. (2001). ''Practical meta-analysis''. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications. ISBN 978-0-7619-2168-4
* O'Rourke, K. (2007) [https://web.archive.org/web/20111102182723/http://andrewgelman.com/movabletype/mlm/JustHistory.pdf Just the history from the combining of information: investigating and synthesizing what is possibly common in clinical observations or studies via likelihood.] Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics. Gives technical background material and details on the "An historical perspective on meta-analysis" paper cited in the references.
Преузето из „https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaanaliza