|
== Дефиниције ==
{{рут}}
'Happiness' is the subject of debate on usage and meaning,<ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/#DouAboValHap</ref><ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571178.001.0001 |title=What is This Thing Called Happiness? |year=2010 |last1=Feldman |first1=Fred |isbn=978-0-19-957117-8 }}</ref><ref>The [[Stanford]] Encyclopedia of Philosophy states that "''An important project in the philosophy of happiness is simply getting clear on what various writers are talking about.''" https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180611093213/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ |date=2018-06-11 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HAYTPP | title=Two Philosophical Problems in the Study of Happiness | access-date=2018-10-13 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181014091327/https://philpapers.org/rec/HAYTPP | archive-date=2018-10-14 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Richard |title=The Long Slide to Happiness |journal=Journal of Philosophy of Education |date=August 2008 |volume=42 |issue=3–4 |pages=559–573 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00650.x }}</ref> and on possible differences in understanding by culture.<ref>"How Universal is Happiness?" Ruut Veenhoven, Chapter 11 in Ed Diener, John F. Helliwell & Daniel Kahneman (Eds.) ''International Differences in Well-Being'', 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, {{ISBN|978-0-19-973273-9}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://personal.eur.nl/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012k-full.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2018-10-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809140901/https://personal.eur.nl/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012k-full.pdf |archive-date=2017-08-09 |url-status=live }}</ref> ▼
▲' HappinessСрећа' isје theпредмет subjectрасправе ofо debateпогледу onупотребе usageи and meaningзначења,<ref> [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/#DouAboValHap Doubts about the value of happiness]</ref><ref>{{cite book |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571178.001.0001 |title=What is This Thing Called Happiness? |year=2010 |last1=Feldman |first1=Fred |isbn=978-0-19-957117-8 }}</ref><ref>The [[Stanford]] Encyclopedia of Philosophy states that "''An important project in the philosophy of happiness is simply getting clear on what various writers are talking about.''" https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180611093213/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ |date=2018-06-11 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://philpapers.org/rec/HAYTPP | title=Two Philosophical Problems in the Study of Happiness | access-date=2018-10-13 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181014091327/https://philpapers.org/rec/HAYTPP | archive-date=2018-10-14 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Richard |title=The Long Slide to Happiness |journal=Journal of Philosophy of Education |date=August 2008 |volume=42 |issue=3–4 |pages=559–573 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00650.x }}</ref> andи onо possibleмогућим differencesразликама inу understandingразумевању byмеђу cultureкултурама.<ref>"How Universal is Happiness?" Ruut Veenhoven, Chapter 11 in Ed Diener, John F. Helliwell & Daniel Kahneman (Eds.) ''International Differences in Well-Being'', 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, {{ISBN|978-0-19-973273-9}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://personal.eur.nl/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012k-full.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2018-10-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809140901/https://personal.eur.nl/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012k-full.pdf |archive-date=2017-08-09 |url-status=live }}</ref>
The word is mostly used in relation to two factors:<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://time.com/money/4070041/angus-deaton-nobel-winner-money-happiness/ |title=particularly section 4 |access-date=2018-10-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181009203422/http://time.com/money/4070041/angus-deaton-nobel-winner-money-happiness/ |archive-date=2018-10-09 |url-status=live }}</ref> ▼
▲TheРеч wordсе isуглавном mostlyкористи usedу inсмислу relationдва to two factorsфактора:<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://time.com/money/4070041/angus-deaton-nobel-winner-money-happiness/ |title=particularly section 4 |access-date=2018-10-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181009203422/http://time.com/money/4070041/angus-deaton-nobel-winner-money-happiness/ |archive-date=2018-10-09 |url-status=live }}</ref>
[[File:Happy children splashing water.jpg|thumb|250п|left|Срећна деца која се играју у води ]]
* theтренутно current experience of theискуство [[feelingОсећање|осећања]] of anнеке [[affect (psychology)Афекат|emotionемоције (affectафекта)]] suchкао asшто су [[pleasureзадовољство]] orили [[joyрадост]],<ref name="auto"/> orили ofопштијег aосећаја more„емоционалног generalстања senseу of 'emotional condition as a whole'целини“.<ref>Dan Haybron (https://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/philos/site/people/faculty/Haybron/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190830115908/https://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/philos/site/people/faculty/Haybron/ |date=2019-08-30 }}, http://www.happinessandwellbeing.org/project-team/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181012094438/http://www.happinessandwellbeing.org/project-team/ |date=2018-10-12 }}); "''I would suggest that when we talk about happiness, we are actually referring, much of the time, to a complex emotional phenomenon. Call it emotional well-being. Happiness as emotional well-being concerns your emotions and moods, more broadly your emotional condition as a whole. To be happy is to inhabit a favorable emotional state.... On this view, we can think of happiness, loosely, as the opposite of anxiety and depression. Being in good spirits, quick to laugh and slow to anger, at peace and untroubled, confident and comfortable in your own skin, engaged, energetic and full of life.''" https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/happiness-and-its-discontents/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181012094415/https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/happiness-and-its-discontents/ |date=2018-10-12 }} Haybron has also used the term thymic, by which he means 'overall mood state' in this context; https://philpapers.org/rec/HAYHAE {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181018003005/https://philpapers.org/rec/HAYHAE |date=2018-10-18 }} Xavier Landes <https://www.sseriga.edu/landes-xavier {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190830115908/https://www.sseriga.edu/landes-xavier |date=2019-08-30 }}> has described a similar concept of [[Mood (psychology)|mood]]. https://www.satori.lv/article/kas-ir-laime {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190513122332/https://www.satori.lv/article/kas-ir-laime |date=2019-05-13 }}</ref> ForНа instanceпример, [[DanielДанијел KahnemanКанеман]] hasје definedдефинисао happinessсрећу asкао "„''whatоно Iшто experienceдоживљавам hereовде andи nowсада''"“.<ref>"''People don’t want to be happy the way I’ve defined the term – what I experience here and now. In my view, it’s much more important for them to be satisfied, to experience life satisfaction, from the perspective of ‘What I remember,’ of the story they tell about their lives.''"https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-why-nobel-prize-winner-daniel-kahneman-gave-up-on-happiness-1.6528513 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181008135016/https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-why-nobel-prize-winner-daniel-kahneman-gave-up-on-happiness-1.6528513 |date=2018-10-08 }}</ref> ThisОва usageупотреба isје prevalentзаступљена inу dictionaryречничким definitionsдефиницијама of happinessсреће.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/happy | title=Happy | Definition of happy in English by Oxford Dictionaries | access-date=2018-10-09 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181009172148/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/happy | archive-date=2018-10-09 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/happiness | title=HAPPINESS | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary | access-date=2018-10-09 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181009211209/https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/happiness | archive-date=2018-10-09 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.dictionary.com/browse/happy | title=The definition of happy | access-date=2018-10-09 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181009172141/https://www.dictionary.com/browse/happy | archive-date=2018-10-09 | url-status=live }}</ref>
* appraisal ofоцена [[life satisfaction|животног задовољства]], such as ofпопут [[qualityKoncept ofkvaliteta života life(medicina)|квалитета живота]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Graham|first1=Michael C.|title=Facts of Life: ten issues of contentment|date=2014|publisher=Outskirts Press|isbn=978-1-4787-2259-5|pages=6–10}}</ref> ForНа instanceпример, [[Ruut Veenhoven|Рут Венховен]] hasје definedсрећу happinessдефинисао asкао "„''overallсвеукупно appreciationуважавање ofнечијег one'sживота lifeу as-a-whole.целини''"“. <ref>https://personal.eur.nl/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012k-full.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809140901/https://personal.eur.nl/veenhoven/Pub2010s/2012k-full.pdf |date=2017-08-09 }}, 1.1</ref><ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180611093213/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ |date=2018-06-11 }} 2011, "‘Happiness’ is often used, in ordinary life, to refer to a short-lived state of a person, frequently a feeling of contentment: ‘You look happy today’; ‘I’m very happy for you’. Philosophically, its scope is more often wider, encompassing a whole life. And in philosophy it is possible to speak of the happiness of a person’s life, or of their happy life, even if that person was in fact usually pretty miserable. The point is that some good things in their life made it a happy one, even though they lacked contentment. But this usage is uncommon, and may cause confusion.' https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181025225319/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/ |date=2018-10-25 }} 2017</ref> KahnemanКахнеман hasје saidрекао thatда thisје isто more important toљудима peopleважније thanод currentтренутног experienceискуства.<ref>“People don’t want to be happy the way I’ve defined the term – what I experience here and now. In my view, it’s much more important for them to be satisfied, to experience life satisfaction, from the perspective of ‘What I remember,’ of the story they tell about their lives.https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-why-nobel-prize-winner-daniel-kahneman-gave-up-on-happiness-1.6528513</ref>
== Филозофија среће ==
|
