Википедија:Позивање на гласање — разлика између измена

| width=17% | '''Transparency

|-

| style="background:#efe;" | Limited posting

| style="background:#efe;" | <small>AND

| style="background:#ffe; font-size:15pt; padding-bottom:6px" | ↕

|-

| style="background:#fee;" | Mass posting

| style="background:#fee;" | <small>OR

|}</center>

 

An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion might place a message at one of the following:

*The talk page of one or more [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProjects]] (or other [[Wikipedia:Collaborations|Wikipedia collaborations]]) directly related to the topic under discussion.

The {{tl|Please see}} template may help in notifying people in a quick, simple, and neutral manner. It is good practice to leave a note at the discussion itself about notifications which have been made, particularly if made to individual users.

 

Inappropriate notification is generally considered to be disruptive. Canvassing normally involves the posting of messages. However, it may also include other kinds of solicitation, such as a custom signature to automatically append some promotional message to every signed post.

 

Below are brief explanations of the most common types of inappropriate notification:

 

Indiscriminately sending announcements to editors can be disruptive for any number of reasons. If the editors are uninvolved, the message has the function of "spam" and is disruptive to that user's experience. More importantly, recruiting too many editors to a [[WP:dispute resolution]] can often make resolving the dispute impossible. Remember the purpose of a notification is to improve the dispute resolution process, not to disrupt it.

 

[[Campaign advertising|Campaigning]] is an attempt to sway the person reading the message, conveyed through the use of tone, wording, or intent. While this may be appropriate as part of a specific individual discussion, it is inappropriate to canvass with such messages.

 

{{Shortcut|WP:Votestacking}}

:''[[Wikipedia:Votestacking]] redirects here. You may be looking for [[Wikipedia:Survey notification]].''

Posting an [[#Appropriate notification|appropriate notice]] on users' talk pages in order to inform editors on all "sides" of a debate (e.g., everyone who participated in a previous deletion debate on a given subject) may be appropriate under certain circumstances on a case-by-case basis.

 

Because it is less transparent than on-wiki notifications, the use of email or other off-wiki communication to notify editors is discouraged unless there is a significant reason for not using talk page notifications. Depending on the specific circumstances, sending a notification to a group of editors by email may be looked at more negatively than sending the same message to the same group of people on their talk pages.

 

The most effective response to quite recent, clearly disruptive canvassing is to politely request that the user(s) responsible for the canvassing stop posting notices. If they continue, they may be reported to the [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]], which may result in their being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] from editing. Users with a prior history of disruptive canvassing, which they have previously been asked to discontinue, may be blocked immediately without further warning, if such an action is deemed to be necessary.

 

For other types of action which are inappropriate in the consensus-building process, see the policy on [[WP:Consensus|Consensus]]. Apart from canvassing, these include [[WP:FORUMSHOP|forum shopping]] (raising an issue on successive discussion pages until you get the result you want), [[WP:SOCK|sock puppetry]] and [[WP:MEATPUPPET|meat puppetry]] (bringing real or fictional outside participants into the discussion to create a false impression of support for your viewpoint), and [[WP:tendentious editing|tendentious editing]].

 

*[[Template:Uw-canvass]], warning for user talk pages

*[[Template:Recruiting]], article talk page message