Концепт — разлика између измена
Садржај обрисан Садржај додат
м + без извора |
. |
||
Ред 1:
'''Концепт''' је тежња одржавања одређене позиције, значење ријечи у одређеном [[контекст]]у, апстраховање реалности у нашим мислима, као и њено симболично представљање. Ријечи које су синоними заговарају исти концепт. Када кажемо за двије реченице да су синоним једна другој, онда можемо рећи да је њихова намјена да одрже позицију исте намјере. Концепт се често анализира у контексту сложених форми или распореда, или чак начина размишљања, дјеловања, и могу имати за резултат различита значења.
== Литература ==
{{refbegin|2}}
*Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1999). what some concepts might not be. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, Concepts (pp. 225–261). Massachusetts: MIT press.
*Carey, S. (1999). knowledge acquisition: enrichment or conceptual change? In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp. 459–489). Massachusetts: MIT press.
*Fodor, J. A., Garrett, M. F., Walker, E. C., & Parkes, C. H. (1999). against definitions. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp. 491–513). Massachusetts: MIT press.
*Fodor, J., & LePore, E. (1996). the pet fish and the red Herring: why concept still can't be prototypes. cognition, 253–270.
*Hume, D. (1739). book one part one: of the understanding of ideas, their origin, composition, connexion, abstraction etc. In D. Hume, a treatise of human nature. England.
*Murphy, G. (2004). Chapter 2. In G. Murphy, a big book of concepts (pp. 11 – 41). Massachusetts: MIT press.
*Murphy, G., & Medin, D. (1999). the role of theories in conceptual coherence. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp. 425–459). Massachusetts: MIT press.
*Prinz, J. J. (2002). Desiderata on a Theory of Concepts. In J. J. Prinz, Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis (pp. 1–23). Massechusettes: MIT press.
*Putnam, H. (1999). is semantics possible? In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp. 177–189). Massachusetts: MIT press.
*Quine, W. (1999). two dogmas of empiricism. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp. 153–171). Massachusetts: MIT press.
*Rey, G. (1999). Concepts and Stereotypes. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core Readings (pp. 279–301). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
*Rosch, E. (1977). Classification of real-world objects: Origins and representations in cognition. In P. Johnson-Laird, & P. Wason, Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science (pp. 212–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*Rosch, E. (1999). Principles of Categorization. In E. Margolis, & S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core Readings (pp. 189–206). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
*Schneider, S. (2011). Concepts: A Pragmatist Theory. In S.Schneider, The Language of Thought: a New Direction. Mass.: MIT Press.
*Wittgenstein, L. (1999). philosophical investigations: sections 65–78. In E. Margolis, & S. Lawrence, concepts: core readings (pp. 171–175). Massachusetts: MIT press.
* ''The History of Calculus and its Conceptual Development'', [[Carl Benjamin Boyer]], [[Dover Publications]], ISBN 0-486-60509-4
* ''The Writings of William James'', [[University of Chicago Press]], ISBN 0-226-39188-4
* ''[[Logic]]'', [[Immanuel Kant]], Dover Publications, ISBN 0-486-25650-2
* ''[[A System of Logic]]'', John Stuart Mill, University Press of the Pacific, ISBN 1-4102-0252-6
* ''Parerga and Paralipomena'', Arthur Schopenhauer, Volume I, [[Oxford University Press]], ISBN 0-19-824508-4
* ''Kant's Metaphysic of Experience'', H. J. Paton, London: Allen & Unwin, 1936
* ''Conceptual Integration Networks.'' Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner, 1998. ''Cognitive Science.'' Volume 22, number 2 (April–June 1998), pages 133–187.
* ''The Portable Nietzsche'', Penguin Books, 1982, ISBN 0-14-015062-5
* Stephen Laurence and Eric Margolis [http://www.philosophy.dept.shef.ac.uk/papers/CCS.pdf "Concepts and Cognitive Science"]. In ''Concepts: Core Readings'', [[MIT Press]] pp. 3–81, 1999.
* Birger Hjørland. (2009). Concept Theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1519–1536
* Georgij Yu. Somov (2010). Concepts and Senses in Visual Art: Through the example of analysis of some works by [[Pieter Bruegel the Elder|Bruegel the Elder]]. ''[[Semiotica]]'' 182 (1/4), 475–506.
* Daltrozzo J, Vion-Dury J, Schön D. (2010). [https://web.archive.org/web/20110814063224/http://daltrozzo.net78.net/papers/Daltrozzo_et_al_2011.pdf Music and Concepts]. Horizons in Neuroscience Research 4: 157–167.
{{refend}}
{{клица-филозофија}}
| |||