Parapsihologija je pseudonauka koja pretenduje da proučava neistražene delove ljudskog uma. U parapsihologiju se ubrajaju još nedovoljno iztraženi fenomeni: telekineza, telepatija, empatija i manipulacija energije. Parapsihologija nije priznata oblast u psihologiji. Velika većina naučnika smatra da je parapsihologija pseudonauka delom zbog nedostatka ponovljivih empirijskih dokaza, a delom i zato što niz parapsiholoških tvrdnji jednostavno ne može biti istinit, „osim ako ostatak nauke nije tačan”.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

Fotografije koje navodno prikazuju duhove bile su popularne tokom 19. veka.
Biološki baziranje alternative
i komplementarna terapija
- edit
NCCAM klasifikacije
  1. Alternativni medicinski sistemi
  2. Intervencije uma i tela
  3. Biološki bazirana terapija
  4. Manipulativne metode
  5. Energetska terapija
Vidi još

Istraživanje parapsihologije uglavnom sprovode privatne institucije u nekoliko zemalja, a finansiraju se putem privatnih donacija,[9][10] i tema se gotovo nikada ne pojavljuje u glavnim naučnim časopisima. Većina radova o parapsihologiji objavljena je u malom broju sporednih časopisa.[11][12] Parapsihologija je bila kritikovana zbog nastavljanja istrage uprkos tome što nije mogla da pruži ubedljive dokaze za postojanje bilo kakvih psihičkih pojava nakon više od jednog veka istraživanja.[13][14]

Terminologija uredi

Izraz parapsihologija skovao je 1889. godine filozof Maks Desuar, kao nemačka „parapsihologija”.[15][16] Kasnije ga je Dž. B. Rajn usvojio tokom 1930-ih kao zamenu za termin psihička istraživanja kako bi ukazao na značajan pomak ka eksperimentalnoj metodologiji i akademskoj disciplini..[17] Izraz potiče od grč. παρά para sa značenjem „pored”, i psihologija.

U parapsihologiji, psi je nepoznati faktor ekstrasenzorne percepcije i psihokinetičkih iskustava koji nije objašnjen poznatim fizičkim ili biološkim mehanizmima.[18][19] Izraz je izveden iz grčkog ψ psi, 23. slova grčke abecede i početnog slova grčke reči ψυχή psyche, sa značenjem „um, duša”.[20][21] Izraz je skovao biolog Bertold P. Visner, a prvi put ga je koristio psiholog Robert Taules u članku iz 1942. godine objavljenom u Britanskom žurnalu psihologije.[22]

Reference uredi

  1. ^ Reber, Arthur; Alcock, James (2019). „Why parapsychological claims cannot be true”. Skeptical Inquirer. 43 (4): 8—10. 
  2. ^ Gross, Paul R.; Levitt, Norman; Lewis, Martin W. (1996). The Flight from Science and Reason. New York City: New York Academy of Sciences. str. 565. ISBN 978-0801856761. „The overwhelming majority of scientists consider parapsychology, by whatever name, to be pseudoscience. 
  3. ^ Friedlander, Michael W. (1998). At the Fringes of Science. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. str. 119. ISBN 978-0-8133-2200-1. „Parapsychology has failed to gain general scientific acceptance even for its improved methods and claimed successes, and it is still treated with a lopsided ambivalence among the scientific community. Most scientists write it off as pseudoscience unworthy of their time. 
  4. ^ Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago, Illinois: University Of Chicago Press. str. 158. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3. hdl:1854/LU-3161824. „Many observers refer to the field as a 'pseudoscience'. When mainstream scientists say that the field of parapsychology is not scientific, they mean that no satisfying naturalistic cause-and-effect explanation for these supposed effects has yet been proposed and that the field's experiments cannot be consistently replicated. 
  5. ^ Alcock, James (1981). Parapsychology-Science Or Magic?: A Psychological Perspective. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press. str. 194–196. ISBN 978-0080257730. 
  6. ^ Hacking, Ian (1993). „Some reasons for not taking parapsychology very seriously”. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 32 (3): 587—594. doi:10.1017/s0012217300012361. 
  7. ^ Bierman, DJ; Spottiswoode, JP; Bijl, A (2016). „Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology”. PLoS ONE. San Francisco, California: Public Library of Science. 11 (5): 1. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1153049B. PMC 4856278 . PMID 27144889. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153049. „We consider [questionable research practices] in the context of a meta-analysis database of Ganzfeld–telepathy experiments from the field of experimental parapsychology. The Ganzfeld database is particularly suitable for this study, because the parapsychological phenomenon it investigates is widely believed to be nonexistent ... results are still significant (p = 0.003) with QRPs. 
  8. ^ Carroll, Sean (11. 5. 2016). „Thinking About Psychic Powers Helps Us Think About Science”. WIRED. New York City: Condé Nast. „Today, parapsychology is not taken seriously by most academics. 
  9. ^ „Koestler Parapsychology Unit”. University of Edinburgh. Pristupljeno 9. 3. 2009. 
  10. ^ Odling-Smee, Lucy (1. 3. 2007). „The lab that asked the wrong questions”. Nature. 446 (7131): 10—11. Bibcode:2007Natur.446...10O. PMID 17330012. doi:10.1038/446010a. Pristupljeno 29. 6. 2007. „[Outside the US] the field is livelier. Britain is a lead player, with privately funded labs at the universities of Edinburgh, Northampton and Liverpool Hope, among others."..."The status of paranormal research in the United States is now at an all-time low, after a relative surge of interest in the 1970s. Money continues to pour from philanthropic sources to private institutions, but any chance of credibility depends on ties with universities, and only a trickle of research now persists in university labs. 
  11. ^ (Pigliucci, Boudry 2013) "Parapsychological research almost never appears in mainstream science journals."
  12. ^ (Odling-Smee 2007) "But parapsychologists are still limited to publishing in a small number of niche journals."
  13. ^ Cordón, Luis A. (2005). Popular Psychology: An Encyclopedia. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. str. 182. ISBN 978-0-313-32457-4. „The essential problem is that a large portion of the scientific community, including most research psychologists, regards parapsychology as a pseudoscience, due largely to its failure to move beyond null results in the way science usually does. Ordinarily, when experimental evidence fails repeatedly to support a hypothesis, that hypothesis is abandoned. Within parapsychology, however, more than a century of experimentation has failed even to conclusively demonstrate the mere existence of paranormal phenomenon, yet parapsychologists continue to pursue that elusive goal. 
  14. ^
  15. ^ Bringmann, Wolfgang G.; Lück, Helmut E. (15. 6. 1997). A Pictorial History of Psychology. Quintessence Pub. ISBN 978-0-86715-292-0. 
  16. ^ Dessoir, Max (jun 1889). „Die Parapsychologie” [Parapsychology] (PDF). Sphinx (na jeziku: nemački). 7 (42): 341 — preko IAPSOP. 
  17. ^ Melton, J. G. (1996). Parapsychology. In Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology. Farmington Hills, Michigan: Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0-8103-9487-2. 
  18. ^ Irwin, Harvey J.; Watt, Caroline A. (2007). An Introduction to Parapsychology (5th izd.). Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. str. 6. ISBN 978-0786430598. 
  19. ^ Wynn, Charles M.; Wiggins, Arthur W. (2001). Quantum Leaps in the Wrong Direction: Where Real Science Ends...and Pseudoscience Begins. Joseph Henry Press. str. 152. ISBN 978-0309073097. 
  20. ^ „Parapsychology FAQ Page 1”. Parapsych.org. 28. 2. 2008. Arhivirano iz originala 26. 6. 2007. g. Pristupljeno 11. 4. 2014. 
  21. ^ „Glossary of Psi (Parapsychological) Terms (L-R)”. Parapsych.org. Arhivirano iz originala 24. 8. 2010. g. Pristupljeno 11. 4. 2014. 
  22. ^ Thouless, R. H. (1942). „Experiments on paranormal guessing”. British Journal of Psychology. London, England: Wiley-Blackwell. 33: 15—27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1942.tb01036.x. 

Literatura uredi

Spoljašnje veze uredi

Klasifikacija